the professional practice between 2 rubbish architects

( Portrait: Le Corbusier)

161-640-400 (17:58) : no sorry i make wrong opinion
161-640-400 (17:59) : bcos i ask my brother on planning part
161-640-400 (17:59) : but we can regard the project as thisPart A - urban planner jobPart B- architects job.
Angus (17:59) : i agree that we have to do the whole development o CDA site.
161-640-400 (17:59) : no we dont need
Angus (18:00) : so.. actuallt we just need to work more on part one... what we have done in part 2 is ok ..right?
161-640-400 (18:00) : yes i think so.
Angus (18:01) : so.. just the MLA.. make it larger will be fine?
161-640-400 (18:01) : bcos the excerise is requiring us to do a Re-zoning applicationbut not to have a whole development CDA site, bcos we are not lawful to do so, unless we have the whol control of the CDA areas
161-640-400 (18:02) : and y the clinet need to Rezone is that he/she do not have the right to do the whole CDA area development , or the cost of doing it is larger than a rezoing application
Angus (18:02) : so... no schemetic MLA need also?
161-640-400 (18:04) : my brother suggest that, bcos we have to do justification, to convince the TPD to rezone., in one of our reasoning, we can compare the development potential of CDA and that of C. then after it, we can draw conclusion that C is better than CDA in our site 1. and request a Rezoning.
161-640-400 (18:05) : in the mean time, with an assumption that we have to protect client's earning ( bcos the client use a set back to convince the TPB for Rezone, and he get a loss in development) , the PR may have changes, and this will lead to a Lease Modification,
Angus (18:06) : um... so.. if success we ignore CDA requirement
161-640-400 (18:06) : yes exactly. we need to
161-640-400 (18:06) : bcos i think this exceris is very tricky.